Closed isabelschober closed 5 years ago
I just noticed the output files of the collect.single() command have the same problem.
Thanks for reporting this. Could you post the commands you ran so I can troubleshoot the issue?
This is the workflow we use with our students
summary.seqs(fasta=SAMPLE.fasta) unique.seqs(fasta=current) summary.seqs(fasta=current, name=current) align.seqs(template=silva.bacteria.fasta, processors=2) summary.seqs(fasta=current, name=current) screen.seqs(fasta=current, name=current, start=6388, end=13855) summary.seqs(fasta=current, name=current) filter.seqs(fasta=current, vertical=T, trump=., processors=2) summary.seqs(fasta=current, name=current) unique.seqs(fasta=current, name=current) summary.seqs(fasta=current, name=current) dist.seqs(fasta=current, cutoff=0.10, processors=2) cluster(name=current, method=furthest) collect.single(label=unique-0.01-0.03-0.05) summary.single(calc=nseqs-sobs-ace-chao-simpson-shannon-shannoneven) rarefaction.single(freq=10) quit()
Mothur is not handling the multiple labels correctly in the output file. This will be fixed in our next version coming soon. As a workaround, you can run the labels individually.
mothur > collect.single(label=unique) mothur > collect.single(label=0.01) mothur > collect.single(label=0.03) mothur > collect.single(label=0.05) ...
Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks again for reporting this issue.
Hello, I'm experiencing an issue with the output of the rarefaction.single() command in the newest mothur release.
Only the first four columns of the table are filled correctly.
The values that should be in the following columns are all in the last row of the file.
When I run my analysis with the same commands in mothur 1.40.0 the output is formatted correctly.
Best, Isabel