Open zhao34731 opened 2 years ago
Thank you. Another question about "exemplars" .
In your paper. The author claimed that some exemplars are selected and adopted for the next session training. As I known, some former works in FSCIL only adopted the embeddings of old classes learned in former session for the current prediction. ( Use the mean of embeddings of training data extracted by the encoder and use the Cosine or L2 distance to make a classification for the current validation) . However some exemplar are saved and combined with the current training data for network update in your method. I think this provide a strong prior knowledge for the network for each update. Also the saved exeplars and the current few-shot data could formulate a balanced training set.
However, in the FSCIL problem setting. maybe the network could only obtain the current training data and the historical data could not be obtaind. I think this is a strict restriction for this problem for practical situation.
So, could you provided some further experiments about the selection about the exemplars ? And how many exepmlars you used for the paper? Thanks.
Hello author, Thanks for the release of the code related to your paper "Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Incremental Few-Shot Learning by Finding Flat Minima" accepted by NIPS2021, which solved FSCIL problem from a specific view. After reading and runing some code related to the classifical methods like: iCaRL, LUCIR, CEC and so on. Some questions are raised as follows.
Thanks.