Closed mountainMath closed 2 years ago
Looks pretty good to me now. A couple things:
spatial_format = NA
-- we'd error them out. We didn't catch it because we obviously have that package installed in our systems, so I removed and tested some new versions of that check against a cleaner environment. Should be good now...I am comfortable with dropping support for 'sp' and only return in 'sf'. I have seen other packages do similar things. The 'sf' package is mature enough now that we can force that. And if people want it in 'sp' format that's an easy conversion at the end.
I am comfortable with dropping support for 'sp' and only return in 'sf'. I have seen other packages do similar things. The 'sf' package is mature enough now that we can force that. And if people want it in 'sp' format that's an easy conversion at the end.
In this version or just fire this one off and focus on proper deprecation in the next one?
I say let's not worry about it in this round and deal with it next time.
Cool. Wanna do a last quick check on your end? I’ll submit now for tests on win and rhub and then throw on cran when I’m home tonight
On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 12:04 PM Jens von Bergmann @.***> wrote:
I say let's not worry about it in this round and deal with it next time.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mountainMath/cancensus/pull/188#issuecomment-1304882239, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMTTZ476PBPFGKKMHXT7JTWG76NBANCNFSM6AAAAAARLW3JIU . You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>
Something went wrong in your fix spatial format check commit, it removed a bunch of functionality and also breaks my code.
Something went wrong in your fix spatial format check commit, it removed a bunch of functionality and also breaks my code.
Ok, confusing, not sure why there's so many diffs. It should be just that section and the one that was previously there immediately above of ~10 lines.
Rolled back the changes and added the part about the spatial format check back in. Can you check to make sure it works as you intended?
Rolled back the changes and added the part about the spatial format check back in. Can you check to make sure it works as you intended?
yeah, this appears to work as intended and I'm confused where the additional diffs came from
Can you try testing with sf
installed and without?
Can you try testing with
sf
installed and without?
Let me know if this works for you and I'll submit. Seems to pass my tests.
Works. I like the menu.
Submitted.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 7:37 PM Jens von Bergmann @.***> wrote:
Works. I like the menu.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mountainMath/cancensus/pull/188#issuecomment-1305038855, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMTTZ6XJCHNIXMCRM5TFATWHBTP3ANCNFSM6AAAAAARLW3JIU . You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>
Submitted.
on CRAN now. We can merge and tag.
Release candidate addressing https://github.com/mountainMath/cancensus/issues/187 and https://github.com/mountainMath/cancensus/issues/184.
Enhaancement https://github.com/mountainMath/cancensus/issues/185 is probably more of a longer term project, but we could try and work at least the CSV xtabs into this one too.