For the course of Web Development, we were assigned to create an e-commerce. I decided to come up with an online store that would sell homemade candies online. This website has a colourful theme and was designed to attract both children and adults.
It helped me to improve my skills to develop unique pages that other users could understand if they ever had to take to lead to create other pages. This was definitely a good experience and I look forward to create more websites next semester.
Style & design — 4
Overall, the style looks great and harmonious. The colours fit the theme quite nicely. The website is clean and the logo is fitting the main idea. The style is fun and original. However, I believe it could have been pushed a little further because the overall website is very simple.
Patterns — 3.5
The patterns are simple and are all working. However, they could have been pushed more in terms of complexity.
Explanations — 4
Explanations are clear and complete, but they could be more descriptive.
Accessibility — 4.5
The website is responsive and accessible. There are skip links and the contrast of colours is good.
Semantics — 3.5
Although there is a good variety of tags, they could have been more carefully chosen.
Responsiveness — 4
The website is responsive, but it could have been better especially for the navigation that is very basic.
Code quality — 3.5
There is a decent semantics, indentation & accessibility. I believe there might be some mistakes.
Git & commits — 3
The commits have some good messages but some should be more specific. Some are too general and confusing.
For the course of Web Development, we were assigned to create an e-commerce. I decided to come up with an online store that would sell homemade candies online. This website has a colourful theme and was designed to attract both children and adults.
It helped me to improve my skills to develop unique pages that other users could understand if they ever had to take to lead to create other pages. This was definitely a good experience and I look forward to create more websites next semester.
Style & design — 4
Overall, the style looks great and harmonious. The colours fit the theme quite nicely. The website is clean and the logo is fitting the main idea. The style is fun and original. However, I believe it could have been pushed a little further because the overall website is very simple.
Patterns — 3.5
The patterns are simple and are all working. However, they could have been pushed more in terms of complexity.
Explanations — 4
Explanations are clear and complete, but they could be more descriptive.
Accessibility — 4.5
The website is responsive and accessible. There are skip links and the contrast of colours is good.
Semantics — 3.5
Although there is a good variety of tags, they could have been more carefully chosen.
Responsiveness — 4
The website is responsive, but it could have been better especially for the navigation that is very basic.
Code quality — 3.5
There is a decent semantics, indentation & accessibility. I believe there might be some mistakes.
Git & commits — 3
The commits have some good messages but some should be more specific. Some are too general and confusing.
30/40 — 75%