2.5
| Personality | Bland, boring, just another graphic designer | Fairly generic but may be better with visual design | Quality layouts and unique, personable content | Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content |
2.5
| Text content | Fake content only | Some real content, some fake | All real content but with lots of errors | Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors |
2
| Responsiveness | Not responsive | Works on some screens | Responsive but with lots of awkwardness | Looks great on all screen sizes |
2
| Documentation | No documentation | Very little documentation | Mostly well documented | Amazing! Anybody could understand |
2
| Use of systems | Everything is repeated | Some good use of Jekyll & Patternbot | Lots of good systemization & reuse | Lego! |
2
| Code quality | Barely started | Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics | Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics | Well indented, fully valid, good semantics |
2
15/21
1. What did you do well?
Overall, the creative aspect was well executed in my opinion. It is simple, but looking like I wanted it to look like. It clean and I am happy with the colour palette. I am happy with the logo and the whole vibe of my portfolio. I like the font choice and the simplicity of my pattern library.
What did you do poorly?
Some cards have some issues on mobile and I wish I could have pushed my code further and document better.
What could be improved?
The code needs to be polished and the content needs to be improved.
What problems did you run into?
While I've written and exported all the necessary content for my portfolio, when I transferred my old documents to my new computer, I lost some of them and had to redo it. I also had trouble getting back into web development as I forgot I to do certain things.
What complications did you overcome?
Even if I've lost some of my files, I remade them.
Does the website communicate the right message?
I am satisfied with the style and vibe of my website, so aesthetically, I would say yes.
Is the website usable?
Not entirely as the work section is empty since the links do not work.
2.5 | Personality | Bland, boring, just another graphic designer | Fairly generic but may be better with visual design | Quality layouts and unique, personable content | Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content | 2.5 | Text content | Fake content only | Some real content, some fake | All real content but with lots of errors | Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors | 2 | Responsiveness | Not responsive | Works on some screens | Responsive but with lots of awkwardness | Looks great on all screen sizes | 2 | Documentation | No documentation | Very little documentation | Mostly well documented | Amazing! Anybody could understand | 2 | Use of systems | Everything is repeated | Some good use of Jekyll & Patternbot | Lots of good systemization & reuse | Lego! | 2 | Code quality | Barely started | Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics | Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics | Well indented, fully valid, good semantics | 2
15/21
1. What did you do well? Overall, the creative aspect was well executed in my opinion. It is simple, but looking like I wanted it to look like. It clean and I am happy with the colour palette. I am happy with the logo and the whole vibe of my portfolio. I like the font choice and the simplicity of my pattern library.
What did you do poorly? Some cards have some issues on mobile and I wish I could have pushed my code further and document better.
What could be improved? The code needs to be polished and the content needs to be improved.
What problems did you run into? While I've written and exported all the necessary content for my portfolio, when I transferred my old documents to my new computer, I lost some of them and had to redo it. I also had trouble getting back into web development as I forgot I to do certain things.
What complications did you overcome? Even if I've lost some of my files, I remade them.
Does the website communicate the right message? I am satisfied with the style and vibe of my website, so aesthetically, I would say yes.
Is the website usable? Not entirely as the work section is empty since the links do not work.
https://laura-meguerditchian.netlify.com/pattern-library/#brand
@thomasjbradley