Open ksolana opened 8 months ago
@jcivlin FYI
Sounds like a great idea. We discuss at the next Move community meeting, I think you, Mysten, Aptos and other can co-sign this. I can work on the form after we discussed.
@sblackshear
We need a new value LLVMDWARFSourceLanguage::LLVMDWARFSourceLanguageMove
likewise llvm to support and generate Dwarf info for all Move language constructs.
We need a new value
LLVMDWARFSourceLanguage::LLVMDWARFSourceLanguageMove
likewise llvm to support and generate Dwarf info for all Move language constructs.
Can you link to/quickly describe whats the difference, meaning wise and process wise? Can we get both with one request?
There are two steps
LLVMDWARFSourceLanguage::LLVMDWARFSourceLanguageMove
1 needs to happen first. But we can do the changes in our internal llvm fork with second part to make progress.
I haven't. Please go ahead.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:56 AM Sam Blackshear @.***> wrote:
@ksolana https://github.com/ksolana, have you done step (1)? I am happy to send an email if not
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/move-language/move/issues/1080#issuecomment-1810384527, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2NVJBB5AMRU3U6IDYEPMM3YEOBCXAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6JZNGXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJQGM4DINJSG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Looks like we dropped the ball on this. Is it still a thing?
Yeah, we are expecting the move language designers to propose this to the DWARF committee.
Requested by Wolfgang: https://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss/2024-February/002361.html
As move->llvm compiler is in the works. There is a need to have Dwarf attribute supporting move programming language.
As per https://dwarfstd.org/languages.html: "Between revisions of the Standard, new language codes may be requested by submitting a request on the Public Comment page."
It can be based on a recent request by Mojo: https://dwarfstd.org/issues/230502.1.html