Closed rhaschke closed 8 years ago
Revived initialization of robot state to named posture. Removed hard-coded parameters from @davetcoleman's version.
@davetcoleman Do you have any idea, why warehouse_ros fails in Jade's Travis?
This repo is still using the old .travis.yml file, which has some sort of problem with using rosinstall files... I don't care to support it since I spent a ton of time making moveit_ci. Would you like me to add it to this repo? It would be no prob
Good point. I will add moveit_ci to this PR. This way it's automatically checked.
@davetcoleman Cool! Checks passed with new moveit_ci
.
From my point of view, this PR could be reviewed and merged.
Looks good after addressing my comments
I addressed most of your comments in code. See my answers to the others ;-)
I addressed the remaining issues. Don't mind to squash on merging ;-)
+1 thanks!
So much for having different commits for different things...
I doubt the .travis.yml
is part of "set of fake controllers".
Now it's one commit in jade-devel
.
cherry-picked to kinetic-devel, as we just discussed we don't want to have things merged in older branches if they are not also merged in the most current one...
Who do I blame... I could have already written a proposed policy for pull-requests/merging...
@rhaschke could you backport this to indigo? It would be awsome to have continuous fake controllers ready to use in indigo. I would like to point some of my students (total MoveIt! newbies) to them for testing their projects.
@rhaschke could you backport this to indigo? It would be awsome to have continuous fake controllers ready to use in indigo.
Done (#23).
@v4hn: Porting this to kinetic, you copied .travis.yml
as is, without switching to kinetic distro. I fixed that in kinetic branch directly.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 03:03:03PM -0700, Robert Haschke wrote:
@v4hn: Porting this to kinetic, you copied
.travis.yml
as is, without switching to kinetic distro. I fixed that in kinetic branch directly.
Oh crap, thanks!
That's why I would have preferred it in a separate request :)
I fixed that in kinetic branch directly.
that's a bending of our protocol! :worried:
Could you announce this great new feature on the mailing list?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:31:25PM -0700, Dave Coleman wrote:
Could you announce this great new feature on the mailing list?
Do that on the next release. The release includes other notable features too (e.g. the "cancel" button")
This reopens #20 against jade-devel.
Implement as set of fake controllers traversing