Open Edu4rdSHL opened 3 years ago
This looks to me like a feature: you wouldn't want the kernel module to be removed, right?... I'm not using dkms
myself, and I suspect that dkms does some sort of find -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1
... which would match the mkmm-xx/module
, but because it's not in a database somewhere?
Anyway, is something broken? Does dkms have a way to "ignore" some kernels?
This looks to me like a feature: you wouldn't want the kernel module to be removed, right?... I'm not using
dkms
myself, and I suspect that dkms does some sort offind -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1
... which would match themkmm-xx/module
, but because it's not in a database somewhere?
Well, something that causes an error message shouldn't be called "feature". And what you're saying is correct -though- but I wonder why we don't put the modules in a hidden folder like .mkmm-xx/...
?
Anyway, is something broken?
No, it doesn't break anything.
Does dkms have a way to "ignore" some kernels?
No, as far as I know.
Can you try https://github.com/moviuro/mkmm/commit/391b5f0f985a4ea2b3177235ca7aaf19484230d1 ? Your problem should no longer occur.
Hello, Movi. As you can see in the following output,
dkms
tries to install the modules inmkmm-$(uname -r)
, probably because it's creating one folder in the kernel's directory.Regards, Ed