WASPC accreditation standards

[moxboxwa]

@hejokelly it looks like there are only 2 requirements related to pursuits in the docs you received:

1. There must be an annual review of pursuits

From 2014, no changes over time AFAICT:

The agency has a policy that requires an annual management review and analysis, with final review approved by the chief executive officer, of the following incidents: • Vehicle pursuits • Use of force events • Internal investigations • Biased based profiling incidents

Purpose: It is the intent that agencies require ongoing first level supervisory and administrative review of these high liability incidents. Additionally, an annual review and analysis of these incidents shall be conducted at the command level, with approval by the CEO, and can be used as an early warning system. Agencies should address policy, procedure, training and/or personnel issues that are identified during this review process.

2. There must be a department policy on pursuits that conforms to WA state law

Both of these also require evidence of compliance in their files/records.

None of the docs you received list the kind of data that should be collected to satisfy the annual review requirement. Is it possible that would be in documents that don't satisfy the explicit wording of the PDR you filed?

[moxboxwa]

@hejokelly I'm also wondering if CJTC has any documents of their own that recommend data collection/review of pursuits.

[moxboxwa]

@hejokelly we have WASPC docs going back to 2014. Is this what we asked for? Or does this mean CJTC only has docs going back that far?

[hejokelly]

@moxboxwa this is just the first installment of records from CJTC.

[hejokelly]

@moxboxwa I've added additional files for your review.