Arlington PD

[hejokelly]

• [x] PDR sent (6/7/24 - hk)
• [x] Receipt of PDR confirmed by autoresponse: https://arlingtonwa.mycusthelp.com/WEBAPP/_rs/(S(kbgwyl0eyojfqztk111ad5mr))/SupportHome.aspx
• [x] Response received
• [ ] ETA received (7/5/24)
• [x] Agency requests clarification (6/14/24)
• [x] Clarification sent (6/21/2024)
• [ ] Data received (installment #/final)
• [ ] Data uploaded
• [ ] Harmonized file created
• [ ] Report produced

[hejokelly]

@moxboxwa same request for clarification as Marysville: Your request states any and all RMS data fields. We interpret this to mean any/all data fields contained within the Incident records and not all data fields within our RMS. Due to limitations of our data extracts we are unable to provide all possible incident data fields in a single data pull. If you can please review the provided information and let us know if you would like us to proceed with additional data pulls for other available data fields within the Incident records of our RMS, or if the data provided meets your needs.

(Copied from email) Me: Okay, this is super weird. Arlington's response is word-for-word identical to Marysville. So they are definitely in contact w/each other about our request. Or they use the same RMS or public records officer? Their dataset also has the same categories (attached). In any event, see my suggestions for how to apply to Marysville. Same suggestions here. APD_PURSUIT_DATA_2019-2023.pdf

You: This is interesting. The data elements are the same too. I’m guessing they may use the same vendor. BTW, I think it would be better to C&P this to Github and continue the conversation there. That would help keep everything in one place…

See Marysville #38 for suggested response