Closed threequartersjohn closed 3 years ago
Merging #116 (98adee6) into master (7fbd99e) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #116 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 115 115
Branches 11 11
=========================================
Hits 115 115
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
www/app/App.js | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
...shared/modules/react-cookie-banner/CookieBanner.js | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7fbd99e...98adee6. Read the comment docs.
The module currently only has one consent, which is analytics, but is prepared to allow for other use cases as well. Therefore there are multiple consents.
Having that said, shouldn’t we be using plural as it’s a collection of consent?
Note that cookies is just the way the consents are stored, we could be using local storage instead. I believe the name CookieBanner is a classic name, based on old cookies policy, but now is broader, as recent privacy regulations must ask specifically for granular consents. In a site where multiple granular consents must be given, this banner would have a checkbox for eacc consent.
Note that cookies is just the way the consents are stored, we could be using local storage instead. I believe the name CookieBanner is a classic name, based on old cookies policy, but now is broader, as recent privacy regulations must ask specifically for granular consents. In a site where multiple granular consents must be given, this banner would have a checkbox for eacc consent.
Hmm, i understand. I'm ok with closing this PR if you don't think there is anything further to say on this.
👍
Changes all instances of
cookieConsents
andCookieConsents
tocookiesConsent
andCookiesConsent
, respectively, where the change in wording is meant to express "The user provides consent for cookies".This is because consent is an uncountable noun in this context.
Consents
is a valid word, but only when the consent in question relates to e.g. documents or otherwise numerable items that individually express some consent, which is not the case here.