Closed lucasg closed 7 years ago
Thanks! I had noticed that construct was active again. Annoying that they've decided to break backwards compatibility.
As for dropping undname – I'm reluctant to do so because I actually use it in my own code pretty often to demangle MSVC++ symbols on Linux. If there's a pure-python alternative that we could drop in in its place, I'd be happy to do that, but it's fairly complex and I haven't wanted to reimplement it myself.
As you want.
While porting
pdbparse
to Python3, I've noticed a bunch ofconstruct
errors (ULInt32 not being defined
for example). The reason being that, after several years of sleep, the construct2 project is active again.However they introduced breaking changes in the API around v2.8 (see this issue for example). Honestly this is kind of infuriating ( who break a 5 y.o library without at least changing the major version ? ) and I don't want to update all the
construct
structs inpdbparse
until I'm positive the construct guys won't break again the API.To stay on the safe side, I stopped the dependency requirement to the last version released by tomer filiba, the original author of construct.
L.
PS: as a side note, if I were you I would drop the
undname
C module inpdbparse
which greatly encumber the whole building process while providing little added value and release the next version ofpdbparse
as a Pure-python library (no separate Linux/Windows build toolchain requirements anymore).