Closed data-sync-user closed 7 months ago
➤ Stefan Vladut commented:
to test this please verify that the urlbar.abandonment and urlbar.engagement events include only the visible search results instead of the whole list and that the awesomebar.engagement and awesomebar.abandonment events are sent alongside the previous 2 events.
➤ Alina Moldovan commented:
Validated as fixed using FF v124 (39587) and iPhone 15+ (17.4)
A different bug was logged for the remaining issue: [[FXIOS-8622] #19140 ⁃ Telemetry - Incorrect "n_results" and "results" values are displayed for urlbar.abandonment & urlbar.engagement & urlbar.impression - Jira (atlassian.net)|https://mozilla-hub.atlassian.net/browse/FXIOS-8622]
Looking at the event sequences, it looks like the
urlbar.abandonment
event may be firing too often. I’m seeing a large number of cases whereurlbar.abandonment
andawesomebar.engagement
are being sent at the same time, and then some where we seeurlbar.abandonment
,awesomebar.engagement
,urlbar.engagement
together.The rate ofsearch_result_tap
is lower than I expected (<10% of (engagement + abandonment) across all suggestion types). However, this is maybe not that surprising given that these are clicks/taps of suggestions. On desktop the rate of clicks per search session for search suggestions is around 10%.I think adding back the
awesomebar
events would be a good idea while theurlbar
events are still new so we have a baseline, as Lina suggested. Does the logic for when theurlbar
events fire differ from what was used for theawesomebar
events? It would be good if theurlbar
events can build on theawesomebar
ones since we already had a discussion to align on the behaviour for those ones.┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Bug