Closed marniepw closed 1 year ago
Thursday: nearly ready to push out for review. Push into hidden state.
I'm proposing we send users to rally.mozilla.org/pixel-psa
This is where the infographic will live, and once we submit extension for review this can't be changed. Note that this is just the URL/slug we are talking about, ie low visibility to end users.
@compzilla please advise what the UTM codes should be. The codes will also be locked in once we submit for review.
@compzilla please advise what the UTM codes should be. The codes will also be locked in once we submit for review.
I think the options here are to send some/all of the attribution codes (if any) stored in the extension based on how it was installed, or to set new ones.
What are we trying to test and how might we measure it?
I think we're testing the behavior of someone who receives the new tab, so in that way, I think of this like its own campaign. Which leads me to think we want a new set of UTM codes in this case. If others agree, let's use the UTM generator to create.
@jepstein that's what I was thinking as well
Do we want a different UTM for both Mozilla and Chrome?
Decision ^ was no. From @rhelmer "Yeah GA has the browser and OS/platform info already, there probably isn't a need to differentiate that w/ our own utm codes too"
Chrome has been approved, but is in hidden state. Still waiting on AMO.
Chrome is live
For extension (Chrome and Firefox) updates only Timer for when the user is idle Take focus to the new page; decision needed on URL and whether UTM code is needed