Open ioanarusiczki opened 3 months ago
Andreas, what's your opinion on this?
I agree that the entity that was escalated should be accurate. In this case an appeal was escalated, so the reviewer tools should say so accordingly.
This might be a separate issue, but we should also make sure that in this case all information about this report is shown to the reviewer, so they can understand and assess the appeal. This includes:
It's unclear from the screenshot if that information is already shown somewhere.
This is the details as available now:
What happened?
From https://github.com/mozilla/addons/issues/2010#issuecomment-2134501006
What did you expect to happen?
Maybe it should be "Escalated appeal via Cinder"
Is there an existing issue for this?
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task