Open ioanarusiczki opened 2 months ago
It's tricky because we don't know if the comments will be a single sentence of a whole block of text. The original specification that legal/t&s put together specified it in-line.
Ah ok, I wanted to add that I've noticed at approval of a version that the email has "Comments" included and maybe it would help for this case too but I didn't see specifications before filing this.
@ioanarusiczki is the email in the screenshot actually including the lorem ipsum text? Or was that just an example?
lorem ipsum part is user input, the comment of a reviewer in rev tools but it can also belong to a Cinder moderator.
For visibility: QA also filed https://github.com/mozilla/addons/issues/14905
We think both are low priority for the moment. We can revisit when this goes live.
What happened?
From https://github.com/mozilla/addons/issues/14878 This is reproducible when appeal is denied from Cinder with Uphold decision + comment added in appeal justification field or from rev tools with Deny Appeal + add comment
Emails look like this:
What did you expect to happen?
The appeal justification coming from Cinder or comment added by an add-on reviewer should be separated.
Is there an existing issue for this?
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task