Closed eviljeff closed 1 week ago
For example for this extension https://reviewers.addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/reviewers/review-listed/634488 The appeal sent by the author is https://stage.cinder.nonprod.webservices.mozgcp.net/job/7f9f1d5c-9e2c-44ad-be0f-4408853b43b5
For a theme https://addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/reviewers/review-listed/633331 , the appeal sent by the author is https://stage.cinder.nonprod.webservices.mozgcp.net/job/9f79e419-d063-4b7c-b424-8fab6d118b48
Example of a theme https://reviewers.addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/reviewers/review/633333 and the appeal sent by the reporter is it went to cinder https://stage.cinder.nonprod.webservices.mozgcp.net/job/6bbfd453-62bb-45a8-8988-9ec07d09dc4f
or a theme currently in the awaiting review queue waiting for review https://reviewers.addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/reviewers/review-listed/633178
I am not sure if at 1. the appeal is expected to be in Cinder. The other 2 choices seem to be fine.
I am not sure if at 1. the appeal is expected to be in Cinder. The other 2 choices seem to be fine.
Yes, Cinder.
Description
Once decisions can potentially not be carried out straight away (https://github.com/mozilla/addons/issues/15074) we need a a specialised review page, where the decision can be confirmed or not.
Out of scope for this initial piece of work: ability to override the decision with a different outcome - if an alternate, but still negative, decision is required it will have to be made again with the reviewer tools.
Acceptance Criteria
Checks
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task