Closed audreytoskin closed 8 years ago
Thanks for the issue. You make an important - and very large - point. 😉
Smart folks like Don Marti are blogging about this a lot, and there are entire web software startups exploring this too.
So, I'm going to close this particular issue, but I encourage you to keep asking this question and get involved with some of the larger efforts and projects out there.
Oh, and Mozilla Firefox content security team and engineers have lots of ideas here too, including healthier cookies, referrer improvements, and other recommended prefs to improve security & privacy in Firefox. All of those etherpads contain links to lots of the bugs.
Interesting! I was sorta hoping Tracking Protection might be able to offer a solution in selectively blocking tracking but leaving the ads --- at some point in the future. I guess that's maybe outside the scope of this project though?
I don't know how it would work technically. But I was already aware of Brave, and it seems to me like that could have been implemented as an extension instead of a whole 'nother Chromium clone.
Web advertising is what does most(?) of the invasive tracking of user behavior. Most ad-blockers let you whitelist a domain, and I normally do so for the websites I frequent. When considering the overlap in functionality between an ad blocker and a tracking blocker, I started wondering: Is it theoretically possible to allow websites to display ads and earn revenue but still block the user-tracking that goes with it?