Open pdehaan opened 4 years ago
/paging Dr @Micheletto
We should compare other services that is also an message transfer agent (MTA) with scoring websites like https://en.internet.nl/mail/relay.firefox.com/430472/#control-panel-9 to see how we compare against them.
ping @moz-astults should we see if we can bump up our DMARC policy to be more strict now?
We should compare other services that is also an message transfer agent (MTA) with scoring websites like https://en.internet.nl/mail/relay.firefox.com/430472/#control-panel-9 to see how we compare against them.
Since this test was done, it looks like we have made this policy more strict
$ dig _dmarc.relay.firefox.com TXT
; <<>> DiG 9.16.8-Ubuntu <<>> _dmarc.relay.firefox.com TXT
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27834
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_dmarc.relay.firefox.com. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_dmarc.relay.firefox.com. 3600 IN TXT "v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;rua=mailto:relay-dmarc@mozilla.com;adkim=r;aspf=r"
;; Query time: 60 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.53#53(127.0.0.53)
;; WHEN: Mon Jun 21 14:17:40 MDT 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 137
Re-tested here: https://en.internet.nl/mail/relay.firefox.com/545612/#control-panel-9
@groovecoder how strict do we want this? We can look into what steps we need to take (if any) to change this policy to reject
if we'd like.
name: Firefox user 14066756 score: 3 ✯ ✯ ✯ created: 2020-10-16 url: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/private-relay/reviews/1609727