Closed xabolcs closed 8 years ago
Nightly and Aurora are green again! :+1:
Nightly and Aurora are green again! :+1:
Interestingly they fail locally.
A note about the new dependency of jpm
is needed somewhere in README.
Interestingly they fail locally.
Ahh, too old jpm
was used. With 1.0.3
all test pass locally.
I believe its you who works on this PR and not me. :)
My two cent about this is that, I'm working on the issue - I provide the fix, and open the PR; you work on the PR - you review the PR.
I wonder about the failure for esr38 and if that is related to the missing loop button error. I do not see that one of our tests is failing but it gets reported that way.
My two cent about this is that, I'm working on the issue - I provide the fix, and open the PR; you work on the PR - you review the PR
The reviewer is not the assignee of a bug/issue/PR. It's always the person which contributes the code. And that's what you did and additionally spent a fair amount of time on it. So I don't want to steal that.
... loop button ...
What is it, where is it?
Anyway, the test killer exception is throw because loop.enabled
is false in ESR38. Interestingly it was true for release 38.
So I don't want to steal that.
I used to steal the issue for that. :)
... loop button ...
Anyway, the test killer exception is throw because
loop.enabled
is false in ESR38. Interestingly it was true for release 38.
@nils-ohlmeier do you know anything about that and why it was turned to false? Would be nice to know if that was wanted or by accident.
I used to steal the issue for that. :)
On an issue several people can contribute to, but not to a PR. So you usually want to assign both to you. Also not sure how github calculates the contribution. So maybe you will miss lots of your actually work.
Also not sure how github calculates the contribution
Github says: Contributions to master, excluding merge commits, I'm in the TOP 3. :+1:
Landed as 120356a565cc5edb38dddff53135e1cce2b0abec.
A note about the new dependency of
jpm
is needed somewhere in README.
@whimboo this was missed.
@whimboo, do you have some good paragraph for README?
Lets discuss this on the issue instead.
Fix for #203.