codecov-commenter
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 79.25%. Comparing base (
3058d30) to head (58cbd99).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #216 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 79.25% 79.25% ======================================= Files 23 23 Lines 1027 1027 ======================================= Hits 814 814 Misses 213 213 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mozilla/mozanalysis/pull/216/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mozilla) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [project](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mozilla/mozanalysis/pull/216/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mozilla) | `79.25% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mozilla#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Addresses #202
Evaluates the pros and cons of using pip-tools and poetry for better dependency resolution.