codecov-commenter
commented
1 month ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 83.66%. Comparing base (
3c47d60) to head (e051d5b).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #270 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 83.66% 83.66% ======================================= Files 19 19 Lines 1353 1353 ======================================= Hits 1132 1132 Misses 221 221 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mozilla/mozanalysis/pull/270/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mozilla) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [project](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mozilla/mozanalysis/pull/270/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mozilla) | `83.66% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mozilla#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Was playing around with the tests for something else and noticed that we were checking for
Exceptionwhen we could be more specific. Also saw some extremely minor typos in the README that I fixed for consistency.