search

mozilla / mrburns

Source for the 2014 version of the glow Firefox download stats site. We bring you love!
https://webwewant.mozilla.org
Mozilla Public License 2.0
9 stars 13 forks source link

Stale peep.py version #191

Closed SamPenrose closed 8 years ago

SamPenrose commented 8 years ago

I'm hitting this issue: https://github.com/erikrose/peep/issues/65 I have tried upgrading to the latest peep.py (2.4.1) and I get a conflict with the constructor of pip's PackageFinder: TypeError: init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'use_wheel' I also tried monkeypatching in the specific fixes from 2.1, but pip has moved on. I'm going to see if I can get peep 2.4.1 working, but this is my first pip/peep exploration and advice would be most welcome.

SamPenrose commented 8 years ago

Removing 'use_wheel' made it work. I'll open an issue with peep to see how to proceed. Meanwhile, I got the following complaints from peep about the requirements:

THE FOLLOWING PACKAGES DIDN'T MATCH THE HASHES SPECIFIED IN THE REQUIREMENTS FILE. If you have updated the package versions, update the hashes. If not, freak out, because someone has tampered with the packages.

django-appconf: expected Ttop2OsMi0qDZmC17_eKDT4NxsGR6ZihQZTy_1ETDaM
                     got BrZLrybHpDbLuBRk56UAR66jDbEFnb5uCdxEPvojuiA
six: expected qI7Y-5I6U8cMLEb75FCLX4Fka0sBQB8VaKghZxszIVw
          got jzT1uJ4X-opuOUUxAxjL1cjLsW-iiPeOqW28cDRMsb8
django-extensions: expected one of qI7Y-5I6U8cMLEb75FCLX4Fka0sBQB8VaKghZxszIVw
                                   53T3tTehlADKaH9I01KrdGFzKsQThd2I_a1Hie-tKcU
                               got Xq3Xc16Qo9r3fzPFVMWo4pMCdDKQIWk2QedPlXqvnfw
django-redis: expected Zv8ahFpsGxbEz1Uu49dGAzl55GzZvV2ZnUtdrpMyelI
                   got 1atp0q0_RjLiD7c6rY0p7t2hfqDGgsQ9JaVkyKzoFE8
pathlib: expected r5dH7CcnQlsbCSUpdeIVAu5aPY0jXH9Jhp6xPgnM9OQ
              got MGMUs3hvTFNNDPYYyw08qPHxamnbOZ0hwFcc4mYeIPY
polib: expected 1DkqfI2RsAXAAlaKhfr2F8ZyQcjNg5nMOV6PEAWv-A0
            got izJ291zi_OlELifbOuY9hCQW4X8OIJXzn_UtxzXldJo

The following packages had no hashes specified in the requirements file, which leaves them open to tampering. Vet these packages to your satisfaction, then add these "sha256" lines like so:

sha256: Ttop2OsMi0qDZmC17_eKDT4NxsGR6ZihQZTy_1ETDaM

Django==1.6.5

sha256: Zv8ahFpsGxbEz1Uu49dGAzl55GzZvV2ZnUtdrpMyelI

django-compressor==1.3

sha256: wbr3o-i-cPNNkx7hcyg_QGh3vT0X83K76CMYpbPFEMw

Werkzeug==0.9.4

sha256: tb0uG3jSgFEQjrqmJIdQIh-czvUrTwVMtyfeYbBAbeA

requests==2.2.1

sha256: hSc7h6s9uTB-OxRSsHHiXB2xzIErwzfSqX6gsM8qtro

nose==1.3.1

sha256: mq4WtWKGak3apeiXhymrrbvtVEco2I4LnJr3sx3Qcu0

django-nose==1.2

sha256: Cmfp2wZbsEY3Xs9TS4l1JR3K86EHUgtFWZ6UmatYZlg

dennis==0.3.11

sha256: L29VCf4YCuMJL9xVlYWoOjz84wr7qd4lzO_F7Pv-2_w

blessings==1.5.1

SamPenrose commented 8 years ago

This appears to be a sorting issue of some, er, sort. peep is in effect complaining that packages have each other's sha's.

mythmon commented 8 years ago

Something to note: No version of peep is compatible with Pip 7.x. The TypeError: init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'use_wheel' error you got is related to that. Downgrading to pip 6.x would fix that particular issue.

The hash mismatches are likely due to Pip 7 defaulting to using wheels, and the hashes you have written down are likely for not-wheels. I predict that using Pip 6 and passing --no-use-wheel will fix your problem.

SamPenrose commented 8 years ago

@erikrose helpfully informed me via that:

pmclanahan commented 8 years ago

Are you trying to install and use mrburns for something? This project is basically abandoned and the site running it is in archive mode showing archived data.

erikrose commented 8 years ago

"The underlying issue" is kind of a funny way of saying it. Basically, pip 8 is gaining peep's functionality.

SamPenrose commented 8 years ago

Ali suggested trying mrburns to serve as the basis of a visualization of Firefox activity around the world that we'd like to do, which led to my discovering this issue. It sounds like if I want to use this code I should create a new project rather than send PRs to this one. I am not blocked. Thanks everyone for your time and thoughts.

pmclanahan commented 8 years ago

Ah! Makes sense now :) I think that this one shouldn't change, but please feel free to fork it or start fresh and copy stuff from it into your own thing.