Closed mzhilyaev closed 12 years ago
Could you run some timing measurement to see if this changes performance much for the better or worse?
timing for addon loading
It appears that simply reading places.sql is what takes the most time. When the file is buffered, query time is reduced by 20x
What are the numbers before with individual urls and after with rev_host?
Disregard the data above. The new data here Before the rev_host change, the addon timing was this:
info: query completion 1757 info: number crunching 5
After rev_host implementation timing is this: info: query time 138 info: number crunching time 5
I no longer can reproduce time difference between fresh and cached porfile
The timing looks good. This pull request has unnecessary changes though. Just take the d1763df commit and rebase it to master and don't include the timing commit.
fixed by using "group by rev_host" query instead of pulling each individual url from places