Open cmcavoy opened 11 years ago
I support this. :+1:
I support the concept and was thinking about the best way to handle it. CNAMEs would work, but I was also thinking about formalizing a method in the spec more generally, something like onBehalfOf
(not the final name, obviously). Some method of handshaking that says "I am an issuer, I am using (e.g.) OpenBadger and I approve that they are issuing badges on my behalf".
My mind went naturally to staking out /.well-known/openbadges/
and sticking some file in there, but this could also be done with a <meta>
tag or a HTTP header.
Implementation details aside, it's definitely something we need.
I think we need to capture the detail that @brianloveswords mentions of "I am an issuer, I am using (e.g) OpenBadger and I approve that they are issuing badges on my behalf."
Thinking about the idea of allowing organizations configured in openbadger to allow the badges to come from their own url's. Point a url to the openbadger instance as CNAME.
This is mostly a placeholder for discussion, but is driven by a partner that wants the badges to come from their own url (DML / HASTAC / UofI) /cc @threeqube @brianloveswords @carlacasilli