I found it somewhat jarring that there are multiple date formats in various places:
sometimes year is 4 digits, sometime only 2
sometimes there are leading zeros ('0'), sometimes not
Personally, I'm a strong believer in ISO-8601 dates. The confusion of 'what century is it' is not something I wish for the next generations.
The patches s/b easy -- the challenge will be picking a 'flag day' to convert the existing data. Or maybe git can handle rename-with-content-change as well. We'd find out. :)
hwine
commented
8 years ago
I found it somewhat jarring that there are multiple date formats in various places:
Personally, I'm a strong believer in ISO-8601 dates. The confusion of 'what century is it' is not something I wish for the next generations.
The patches s/b easy -- the challenge will be picking a 'flag day' to convert the existing data. Or maybe
gitcan handle rename-with-content-change as well. We'd find out. :)This may be related to issue #9.