Open carlin-q-scott opened 5 years ago
Could you also show the command that you used to generate the given output?
The observed behavior might be related to #1641
Sure, the command I used is: web-ext sign --channel=unlisted --api-key ******* --api-secret *******
@carlin-q-scott Does this still happen with the latest version (3.1.1) ? That version contains a fix to #1641.
Yes, this issue is still present in v3.1.1
Is this a feature request or a bug?
Bug
What is the current behavior?
The 'sign' command includes the web-ext-artifacts folder when packaging the extension.
What is the expected or desired behavior?
All web-ext commands should ignore the output folder used by web-ext. The 'build' command already does, which leads to someone testing with a correctly packaged extension and then publishing a bloated extension using the 'sign' command
Version information (for bug reports)
Additional details
It seems the 'sign' command filters out zip and xpi files. So in theory that would exclude whatever is in the artifacts folder. However, I build my extension for Chrome and Opera so there are nex and crx files in the folder, as well as my extension unpacked for testing in Chrome and Opera.
Here's a capture of the output from the sign command: sign.log