Open award28 opened 1 year ago
Could you lend me a hand on this PR to get those json files to work with the new testing approach?
@award28 Yeah of course :) There's two approaches we could take:
1) "fix" run.mjs now (this would be a very minor change) and integrate the testing approach in a follow-up PR 2) Integrate the testing approach in this PR and remove run.mjs
I've raised a quick fix for run.mjs in this PR. I'll start working on the changes needed to remove run.mjs
now :) my preference would be to merge these changes as a separate PR since I don't want to risk unnecessarily delaying this one
Definitely agree, thanks for the quick turn around! I've merged those changes into this branch. Based on feedback from #39, I should be good to remove the run
binary and update CI.
@mpalmer bumping this in case you missed it
Thanks for the bump, @award28, this slipped off my radar. I've put this on my list to review tomorrow; to answer your question:
Should we still maintain the run test binary?
Burninate it.
Any update on this? Happy to pick up the changes requested if you don't have capacity @award28 :)
Hey @award28, do you have the bandwidth to push this through to completion, or shall @bcheidemann and myself finish it off and land it?
Per @mpalmer's request in #39, I've extracted the testing and contributing changes into a separate PR. This still includes the changes to
save-snapshot
.@mpalmer Should we still maintain the
run
test binary? I don't see a reason why we would need to, but there may be something I'm not thinking of.@bcheidemann From your comment here you mention
Could you lend me a hand on this PR to get those json files to work with the new testing approach?