Closed mpastell closed 7 years ago
Thanks for reviewing the pulls requests, and planning the 0.3 release 😄
would anyone have time see whats is broken in the docs at the moment?
I'm somehow familiar with some of the changes introduced in 0.3, I've read parts of the code for making spyder-reports
compatible with the current master. Tomorrow I'll give a try to update the docs
Thanks @mpastell for contacting us about this new release!
@rlaverde, I think you should first move PWeave docs here, then update them and finally make them part of the package (I think all can be part of the same PR)
That way we could add a link in the welcome page of spyder-reports
to point to PWeave docs.
Thanks! With a quick look there aren't actually that many things that don't work with 0.3 in the docs, but mainly new features of are missing.
I think the major difference comes from getting output in nicer format with the jupyter display system.
Anyway I would feel comfortable doing a release with docs that are up to date even if some things are initially missing.
Hi, sorry for the delay answering.
I am for pre-release rather than declaring it a stable one, since there is issue #61. It is not happening frequently, but it is IMHO jeopardizing idea of reproducibility.
I have tried to investigate #61 and it is annoying, but I'm not sure if people will hit it during normal use. It seems to be a bug in jupyter_client
, but I need to investigate further before making a bug report there.
I have done some work on the docs and pushed updates to that repo. You can see the current status also at http://mpastell.com/pweave/0.30/index.html . I think they are almost ready for a release
I pushed a pre-release 0.30rc1 to pypi. I tried using it with few of my larger documents as well and didn't find any issues.
I just take a look to the updated docs, thanks for updating them, I was struggling with some little errors (missing ipykernel, and the term mode missing output),and didn't have time to start updating the docs.
It's something missing that I could help to do? could the docs be copied into the package to be distributed with it?
could the docs be copied into the package to be distributed with it?
Yes, if they are moved here. Please take a look at how we do it in Spyder.
Yes, I'll move them before release. It was just quicker to work on the old repo.
The docs are now in this repo. I just pushed Pweave v0.30 to pypi and will update the conda recipe. Thanks to all for the fixes!
Thanks a lot @mpastell!
@rlaverde @abukaj @ccordoba12
I received a request to release for 0.3. As far as I know (with not very active use lately) there are no blocking bugs or incomplete features in the current master.
The blocking issue right now is that the documentation is not up to date. Would you like to see a release anyway with partially outdated documentation? Or would anyone have time see whats is broken in the docs at the moment?
The docs are in https://github.com/mpastell/pweave-docs, and should also be moved under this repo.