Open jottinger opened 2 months ago
Hi @jottinger, there are ignoreCase(String)
, ignoreCase(Char)
and ignoreCase(int)
that ignore the case of the provided string/char/codepoint.
Yeah, I found those. IMO, having an analog to string()
be ignoreCase
is insufficient naming; I'd think the two methods would be string("foo")
and stringIgnoreCase("foo")
. I'd found the variant by the time you'd commented, by accident, purely from crawling through AbstractGrammar's source code. (This happened for another issue, too, issue #50).
Some history: when I initially started work on grampa I have taken over the naming mainly from parboiled1. Just have a look at this: https://www.javadoc.io/doc/org.parboiled/parboiled-java/latest/org/parboiled/BaseParser.html :-)
I can change the names of these rule functions to be more precise, probably in the next major release (since this would be a breaking change).
You could - or you could alias them over, which is what I'd do, personally. It clouds the API a little bit (because methods are duplicated, even though they'd defer to a central spot) but... honestly? Method slots are CHEAP.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:20 PM Marco Perazzo @.***> wrote:
Some history: when I initially started work on grampa I have taken over the naming mainly from parboiled1. Just have a look at this: https://www.javadoc.io/doc/org.parboiled/parboiled-java/latest/org/parboiled/BaseParser.html :-)
I can change the names of these rule functions to be more precise, probably in the next major release (since this would be a breaking change).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mpe85/grampa/issues/49#issuecomment-2344721454, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADSNGTWLWUMPSCPXHE2FTDZWCXYFAVCNFSM6AAAAABN5IU4EKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNBUG4ZDCNBVGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
-- Joseph B. Ottinger http://www.enigmastation.com http://enigmastation.com To the beautiful and the wise,
Yeah, introduce stringIgnoreCase()
and deprecate ignoreCase()
would be the way to go I think.
Is there a way to match such that "ThIS" and "this" both match
string("this")
?