Closed mpenning closed 2 years ago
This issue has automatically been marked stale due to inactivity. The issue will close unless further activity occurs. Please understand that the CiscoConfParse team is not obligated to comment on every issue. For more detailed information, please refer to our CONTRIBUTING guidance.
Due to inactivity, CiscoConfParse's maintainers are closing this issue. Please refrain from further comments. In the future, CiscoConfParse's maintainers may reopen it solely at their own discretion. For more detailed information, please refer to our CONTRIBUTING guidance -> https://github.com/mpenning/ciscoconfparse/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
It seems that the
factory=True
code inmodels_cisco.py
andmodels_asa.py
is becoming somewhat popular. These days, I am getting bugs filed against it as much as regular ciscoconfparse code.Sadly, there is a lot of work to do on the
factory=True
methods, and I am not convinced that the factory model for configuration lines is the right approach yet; this doesn't mean I will rip it out, but it certainly does mean I'm not done...Please heed the warning at the top of the source code, until I work out the right direction to take this effort. As such, the code in
models_cisco.py
andmodels_asa.py
might change... significantly.All that said, I don't mind bugs filed against
factory=True
; I definitely want to know what to prioritize.