Closed josePhoenix closed 7 years ago
(My small act of protest of always referring to JWST rather than Webb ran up against the aesthetics of naming something JWSTOTEPupil and my activist side lost.)
Yeah, neither of those are great. I agree that "JWST" would be preferable in general (Overall it seems like people refer to the observatory less often as "Webb" these days than was common 5 or 6 years ago? But that's anecdotal, not data.) But that stack of capitalized letters isn't aesthetically pleasing. Even so I think it might be better to just go with JWSTOTEPupil
and the like.
It is WebbPSF, after all. WebbOTEPupil
is growing on me.
It is WebbPSF, after all. WebbOTEPupil is growing on me.
That reminds me of the question we've been dodging for a while, whether it should be instead WebbAndWFIRSTPSF
(answer: no.) or something else entirely more inclusive (answer: maybe??) but rebranding would be a pain, so I'm still inclined to punt.
Yes, let's kick that can down the road. (Maybe there's a Greek god or goddess of PSFs? Worked for the ETC people...)
Some code polish and elbow grease for
optics.py
. Notably, this includes some class renames that were updated inwebbpsf_core.py
as well. I also moved the coordinate pairs for the JWST primary into aconstants.py
to improve the readability ofoptics.py
. Here are the renames:JWST_primary_aperture
->WebbPrimaryAperture
JWST_OTE_Pupil
->WebbOTEPupil
JWST_Field_Dependent_Aberration
->WebbFieldDependentAberration
NIRSpec_Field_Dependent_Aberration
->NIRSpecFieldDependentAberration
NIRCam_Field_and_Wavelength_Dependent_Aberration
->NIRCamFieldAndWavelengthDependentAberration
MIRI_Field_Dependent_Aberration_and_Obscuration
->MIRIFieldDependentAberrationAndObscuration
(My small act of protest of always referring to JWST rather than Webb ran up against the aesthetics of naming something
JWSTOTEPupil
and my activist side lost.)