Open jeffhammond opened 1 year ago
Is this something intended for MPI 4.1? If so, it needs to be read at the July meeting and announced by June 26th.
This seems like a chapter committee change, or an editorial one, and not a high priority in either way, because even though there's an omission here, absolutely no one has struggled to use MPI because of it.
I agree that it is a chapter committee change. This is also another example of the folly of enumerating instances, in this case, mpi.h and mpif.h. Better would be a term for all of these, though we don't have one.
Yes, "in mpi.h and mpif.h," on page 41 line 24 should be substituted by, e.g., "in mpi.h, the Fortran mpi_f08 and mpi modules, and mpif.h,".
Problem
The following does not mention the Fortran modules. It should have.
Proposal
Add Fortran modules to "its structure is declared in mpi.h and mpif.h,"
Changes to the Text
Add Fortran modules to "its structure is declared in mpi.h and mpif.h,"
Impact on Implementations
None
Impact on Users
Clarity in the standard.
References and Pull Requests