search

mqtt-tools / pytest-mqtt

pytest-mqtt supports testing systems based on MQTT.
MIT License
9 stars 2 forks source link

Add a little delay to the Mosquitto fixture #22

Closed amotl closed 2 months ago

amotl commented 2 months ago

Problem

Possibly faster GitHub runners made MQTT software tests fail on the LorryStream project.

Solution

Add a little delay.

References

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 95.73%. Comparing base (3e410fb) to head (d1e05c2).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #22 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 95.70% 95.73% +0.02% ========================================== Files 5 5 Lines 163 164 +1 ========================================== + Hits 156 157 +1 Misses 7 7 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mqtt-tools/pytest-mqtt/pull/22/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mqtt-tools) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/mqtt-tools/pytest-mqtt/pull/22/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mqtt-tools) | `95.73% <100.00%> (+0.02%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=mqtt-tools#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.