Open unruledboy opened 5 years ago
There are cases we simply want the jobs to be in memory only, not being backed by databases.
Can we just hold the jobs in memory?
Thanks.
Good idea. There's no in memory adapter right now, but implementing it shouldn't be very hard.
I've been away from this for a long time, so I'll implement in-memory soon if nobody else attempts it.
There are cases we simply want the jobs to be in memory only, not being backed by databases.
Can we just hold the jobs in memory?
Thanks.