Looking through the Ebola data set there are several parameter entries that state $distribution_par2_type as "Mean sd". When I first read this I assumed it was the standard deviation of the mean. However, I've read two of the papers where this is reported Rosello et al. (2015) and Chan and Nishiura (2020) and in both cases, my interpretation of the results is they report the mean and standard deviation of the distribution.
Another reason for the confusion is that in the Lassa parameters some are reported as "Mean" and "Standard deviation" for $distribution_par1_type and $distribution_par2_type, respectively. If the Ebola data is the mean and standard deviation of the distribution it would be good to standardise this across pathogens.
Below I've pasted some reproducible examples showing in code which entries I'm mentioning.
Ebola data
ebola_data <- epireview::load_epidata("ebola")
#> Warning: One or more parsing issues, call `problems()` on your data frame for details,
#> e.g.:
#> dat <- vroom(...)
#> problems(dat)
#> Warning in load_epidata_raw(pathogen, "outbreak"): No data found for ebola
#> Warning: One or more parsing issues, call `problems()` on your data frame for details,
#> e.g.:
#> dat <- vroom(...)
#> problems(dat)
#> Warning in epireview::load_epidata("ebola"): No outbreaks information found for
#> ebola
#> Data loaded for ebola
lassa_data <- epireview::load_epidata("lassa")
#> Warning: One or more parsing issues, call `problems()` on your data frame for details,
#> e.g.:
#> dat <- vroom(...)
#> problems(dat)
#> One or more parsing issues, call `problems()` on your data frame for details,
#> e.g.:
#> dat <- vroom(...)
#> problems(dat)
#> One or more parsing issues, call `problems()` on your data frame for details,
#> e.g.:
#> dat <- vroom(...)
#> problems(dat)
#> Data loaded for lassa
Looking through the Ebola data set there are several parameter entries that state
$distribution_par2_type
as "Mean sd". When I first read this I assumed it was the standard deviation of the mean. However, I've read two of the papers where this is reported Rosello et al. (2015) and Chan and Nishiura (2020) and in both cases, my interpretation of the results is they report the mean and standard deviation of the distribution.Another reason for the confusion is that in the Lassa parameters some are reported as "Mean" and "Standard deviation" for
$distribution_par1_type
and$distribution_par2_type
, respectively. If the Ebola data is the mean and standard deviation of the distribution it would be good to standardise this across pathogens.Below I've pasted some reproducible examples showing in code which entries I'm mentioning.
Ebola data
Created on 2024-06-14 with reprex v2.1.0
Lassa data
Created on 2024-06-14 with reprex v2.1.0