Currently all locations implicitly have the same riskiness/receptivity to transmission in our model - we should add some variation on top of this.
Unclear how exactly to do this currently - we could do something like a draw from a lognormal distribution with a mean centred around 1, e.g. rlnorm(n, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1) as proposed with https://github.com/mrc-ide/helios/issues/87 - but based on conversations with others it seems possible/plausible that setting-riskiness might be correlated with size (and also with far UVC efficacy) so this might require a little more careful thinking!
Currently all locations implicitly have the same riskiness/receptivity to transmission in our model - we should add some variation on top of this.
Unclear how exactly to do this currently - we could do something like a draw from a lognormal distribution with a mean centred around 1, e.g.
rlnorm(n, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1)
as proposed with https://github.com/mrc-ide/helios/issues/87 - but based on conversations with others it seems possible/plausible that setting-riskiness might be correlated with size (and also with far UVC efficacy) so this might require a little more careful thinking!