Closed Sydney-o9 closed 10 years ago
Hi @Sydney-o9 , Glad you like it!
I haven't touched this for a while now but I've just had brief look...
What I think is happening is that _startTimer() counts as the first tick which sets the clock to zero. It then cues the next tick up after a certain amount of time which then adds the given amount of time to the clock. If _tick was called instantly it would start counting at 1 tick.
However, if that's right then it should be interval
rather than 100
. Either way something's not quite right!
I'll have to look into it more. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Hey @mrchimp,
Great work! I am impressed by how accurate that thing is.
I have a quick question, why delay the timer on start?
see Here