mrhan1993 / Fooocus-API

FastAPI powered API for Fooocus
GNU General Public License v3.0
567 stars 152 forks source link

Worker error - save_meta is an invalid keyword argument for GenerateRecord #375

Closed ldavis9000aws closed 2 months ago

ldavis9000aws commented 3 months ago

Hello,

I get the following error whenever I generate an image via the Fooocus-API and use the "--persistent" switch:

[2024-07-02 18:10:49] ERROR [Fooocus] Worker error: 'save_meta' is an invalid keyword argument for GenerateRecord

The image generates, but there is no job history when you query historical job data. I updated to the latest version, but the issue is still there.

ldavis9000aws commented 3 months ago

Summary of Issues and Resolutions: Database Schema Mismatch and Worker Errors

I was trying to use the "--persistent" switch and encountered several issues related to missing columns in the generate_record table. These issues were primarily caused by mismatches between the ORM model definitions and the actual database schema. Below is a summary of the problems faced and the steps taken to resolve them. I'm not a developer, bu

Issues Encountered

  1. Invalid Keyword Argument: save_meta When using the --persistent switch, the following error occurred:

    ERROR    [Fooocus] Worker error: 'save_meta' is an invalid keyword argument for GenerateRecord

    Cause: The GenerateRecord class in sql_client.py lacked a definition for the save_meta attribute, resulting in a mismatch when saving records.

  2. Invalid Keyword Argument: meta_scheme A subsequent error appeared for another missing attribute:

    ERROR    [Fooocus] Worker error: 'meta_scheme' is an invalid keyword argument for GenerateRecord

    Cause: Similar to the previous issue, the meta_scheme attribute was missing in the GenerateRecord class.

  3. Invalid Keyword Argument: save_name Another missing attribute error:

    ERROR    [Fooocus] Worker error: 'save_name' is an invalid keyword argument for GenerateRecord

    Cause: The save_name attribute was also not defined in the GenerateRecord class.

  4. SQLite Operational Error: Missing Columns After adding the attributes to the ORM model, an error related to the actual database schema was encountered:

    [2024-07-02 19:16:06] ERROR    [Fooocus] Worker error: (sqlite3.OperationalError) table generate_record has no column named save_meta

Resolutions

  1. Add Missing Attributes to GenerateRecord Class The following attributes were added to the GenerateRecord class in sql_client.py:

    class GenerateRecord(Base):
       # Existing definitions...
       save_meta: Mapped[Optional[bool]] = mapped_column(Boolean, nullable=True)
       meta_scheme: Mapped[Optional[str]] = mapped_column(Text, nullable=True)
       save_name: Mapped[Optional[str]] = mapped_column(Text, nullable=True)
       # Full class definition omitted for brevity...
  2. Update Database Schema The database schema was updated to include the new columns by running the following SQL commands:

    ALTER TABLE generate_record ADD COLUMN save_meta BOOLEAN;
    ALTER TABLE generate_record ADD COLUMN meta_scheme TEXT;
    ALTER TABLE generate_record ADD COLUMN save_name TEXT;

    In my case, I just manually added them using DB Browser for SQLLite.

Conclusion

The Fooocus API can now successfully save history to the database when using the --persistent switch.

Example: image

mrhan1993 commented 3 months ago

Interested in trying a rewrite of FooocusAPI

mrhan1993 commented 2 months ago

Changing the database structure is still complicated for users, so my choice is to drop these new fields。thx for your work on this issue

ldavis9000aws commented 2 months ago

Changing the database structure is still complicated for users, so my choice is to drop these new fields。thx for your work on this issue

Doesn't this mean custom names for saving images and metadata for previously generated images won't be stored in the history database? This is important for my specific needs. I was expecting to be able to query this data through the job history endpoint. It seems like the original goal of storing job history was to provide this kind of information.

I understand that your solution would address the issue by dropping the new fields, but an alternative might be to use a script that checks if the database schema is up to date and updates it if necessary during the API startup. This way, we wouldn't need any user interaction.

Currently, the persistent switch hasn't been working, causing all job history to be lost whenever the API is shut down. Going this route would make sure detailed job history is preserved.

mrhan1993 commented 2 months ago

No, it doesn't lose any useful information. You can get the final file name from result_url, while save_meta is just true or false, and meta_scheme is just fooocus or a111

ldavis9000aws commented 2 months ago

Interested in trying a rewrite of FooocusAPI

Ha! I wish I would've seen that repo earlier, lol. I'll try it out in the next day or so.

mrhan1993 commented 2 months ago

I think is a better version

ldavis9000aws commented 2 months ago

@mrhan1993 So I tried out the newer version and there are a few things I noticed:

It seems like the new API is returning the image directly in the response body rather than just a URL or metadata about the image. This seems to be causing the character limit of the OpenAI Assistants API I'm using.

fooocusapi-response-body-example

Can the response be modified to work like the original rather than sending back the entire image? I would open an issue on the new repo, but doesn't look like there's an option to do so.

image

image

mrhan1993 commented 2 months ago

Okay, I understand your point. It was indeed my oversight. I will make the necessary adjustments to this section.

mrhan1993 commented 2 months ago

@ldavis9000aws I modified the return logic, now if you use the default parameters, will return a json, but the data format will be somewhat different, you may need to pay attention to

图片