With b4 v0.12.4, while applying the patch series from message ID 0240516122102.16379-1-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com,
b4 seems to be confusing the individual patches as different versions of one patch, and only applies the one patch it considers the latest one, while ignoring the other 23 patches:
$ b4 shazam -C -l -s -t 20240516122102.16379-1-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20240516122102.16379-1-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com/t.mbox.gz
Checking for newer revisions
Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
Analyzing 38 messages in the thread
Assuming new revision: v2 ([PATCH v6,19/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: disable wait interrupt for svp mode)
Assuming new revision: v3 ([PATCH v6,23/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: support av1 svp decoder for mt8188)
Assuming new revision: v4 ([PATCH v6,22/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: support hevc svp for mt8188)
Assuming new revision: v5 ([PATCH v6,24/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: support vp9 svp decoder for mt8188)
Assuming new revision: v6 ([PATCH v6,18/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: remove parse nal_info in kernel)
Assuming new revision: v7 ([PATCH v6,20/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: support tee decoder)
Assuming new revision: v8 ([PATCH v6,17/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: re-construct h264 driver to support svp mode)
Assuming new revision: v9 ([PATCH v6,21/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: move vdec init interface to setup callback)
Assuming new revision: v10 ([PATCH v6,16/24] media: mediatek: vcodec: support one plane capture buffer)
Will use the latest revision: v10
You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✓ [PATCH] media: mediatek: vcodec: support one plane capture buffer
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240516122102.16379-17-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com
+ Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
---
✓ Signed: DKIM/mediatek.com
---
Total patches: 1
---
Applying: media: mediatek: vcodec: support one plane capture buffer
Not sure if it's because of the comma in the subject prefix or something else.
With b4 v0.12.4, while applying the patch series from message ID
0240516122102.16379-1-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com
, b4 seems to be confusing the individual patches as different versions of one patch, and only applies the one patch it considers the latest one, while ignoring the other 23 patches:Not sure if it's because of the comma in the subject prefix or something else.