Open jjones425 opened 8 years ago
I think the comment was simply to include the "current implementation status" that we had from the slide. Sounds like it'll be a weird addition to the doc, though; does anyone have examples of how this has been done before?
Do we know who asked for that? Could we get more context?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:24, Mark Rishernotifications@github.com wrote:
I think the comment was simply to include the "current implementation status" that we had from the slide. Sounds like it'll be a weird addition to the doc, though; does anyone have examples of how this has been done before?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
I am going to research what others have done with respect to implementation sections. Stephen was one of the folks that mentioned, so, I will connect with him to get his feedback.
Reaching out to Barry Leiba to get more feedback as the UTA notes mentioned he had feedback on this.
Barry responded, referenced RFC 7942 (BCP 205).
I read through RFC 7942 (BCP 205). Here are a few things to note. Please comment on recommendation and I will update the draft.
Here is what I recommend – please comment @mrisher @abrotman @danmarg @prbinu
Recommendation to include Implementation section