Closed yonas closed 2 months ago
havn is a single self-contain binary, whereas RustScan requires the third party nmap application to function.
I suspect RustScan is more configurable, although the reason havn was created was due to my inability to easily start and run a RustScan instance – although this probably says more about me rather than the RustScan project.
It also appears that RustScan doesn’t have Docker containers nor binaries for other CPU platforms. havn is tested, built for, and works perfectly, on Linux x86, armv6, arm64, and Windows x86
Thanks!
How does havn compare to RustScan?