Closed mrmrinal closed 2 years ago
Hi,
While your suggestion could be valid in certain cases, we believe that it may not apply to our UG. Considering that our current features are not very easy to group together intuitively, it would not make any sense to have such groupings and doing so could possibly impede the readability.
As such, we feel the current way it is done might be better.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
The structuring of the UG could be further subdivided into smaller command types. This makes it easier for the user to navigate straight in the subsection they are interested in viewing. For example: