Closed nh2 closed 5 years ago
Is this still desired?
One moment, I will check
It looks like I have switched my use cases from https://hackage.haskell.org/package/msgpack to https://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-msgpack since (the latter was made "since the original author is unreachable").
So I personally would no longer need this, given that the other package also claims "This fork incorporates a number of bugfixes and is actively being developed".
Fair enough; just for the record, effective immediately this library is maintained again :-)
@hvr OK, good to know!
Have you already had a chance to look at the differences the fork has made so far, maybe some of them are useful to pick back up?
I skimmed the fork and I think most of the functional non-refactoring changes were already submitted as PRs to this repo (and have been merged). I'll take a closer look at some point in the future to see if there's anything else I'd like to steal back... :-)
Hi,
I saw that you released msgpack-1.0 - congrats!
However, the changes are quite a lot (e.g. switching to
binary
).Would you mind making another point release in the 0.7 series that allows higher upper bounds on some standard packages like
text,attoparsec,template-haskell
?Currently I have to use
--allow-newer
to use it, see e.g. here: https://travis-ci.org/nh2/call-haskell-from-anything/jobs/61278874#L184Thanks!