Closed mshick closed 1 year ago
@kishaningithub For #93 my preference would be to check the size of the message and break it into parts if we're going to hit the limit.
The use you describe above seems like it could be handled better by multiple instances of the action, for example:
on:
pull_request:
jobs:
pr:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
pull-requests: write
steps:
- uses: mshick/add-pr-comment@v2
with:
message-id: foo
message-path: |
foo/*.txt
- uses: mshick/add-pr-comment@v2
with:
message-id: bar
message-path: |
bar/*.txt
@kishaningithub Feel free to open a new issue if you have suggestions for improvements to the concatenation feature.
I never realised that message-path
supports globs. Thanks a lot for that example! 👍
Given https://github.com/mshick/add-pr-comment/issues/93 i feel there should be an option which creates multiple comments if
multiple-paths
are given. That way there can probably be a step before calling this action which splits a very big comment into multiple comments and puts them in separate files. what do you think?