Closed rmandelb closed 10 years ago
Yes, I think so at least for the CCD level. I'll make a change based on branch #7.
I added a simple change for this.
For CCD-level tests, a filename is
$SUPRIME_DATA_DIR/rerun/[rerun/name/for/stile]/%(pointing)05d/%(filter)s/stile_output/[sys_test_name]-%(visit)07d-%(ccd)03d.png
. For field-level tests, a filename is
$SUPRIME_DATA_DIR/rerun/[rerun/name/for/stile]/%(pointing)05d/%(filter)s/stile_output/[sys_test_name]-%(visit)07d-[ccds].png
, where [ccds]
is a reduced form of a CCD list. For example, if a CCD list is [0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10]
, [ccds]
becomes 0..2^4..6^8^10.
Do we want to merge this change to the PR of #7 , or do we want make a PR for this branch after merging #7 to master?
If you don't mind merging it into #7, let's do that--this is much better!
Done! Shall we close this issue?
Sure! Closing...
Hironao would like to change the file output so that the filename automatically includes visit/CCD or tract/patch or some other unique-ish identifier, so that plots don't get overwritten when you make a new one for a new CCD. I believe he said this should be a simple change that he can do. Is that right, @HironaoMiyatake ?