search

msimet / Stile

Stile: the Systematics Tests In Lensing pipeline
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
9 stars 6 forks source link

priorities for January #51

Closed rmandelb closed 6 years ago

rmandelb commented 9 years ago

This is an issue for collecting priorities for Stile work in January.

@msimet , you mentioned some priorities to me, verbally. @HironaoMiyatake , do you have any thoughts? Are there any important things for which we don't have a person to work on it?

msimet commented 9 years ago

My two high-priority items are:

HironaoMiyatake commented 9 years ago

My priority is on #43 . #47 is useful for running a bunch of tests.

rmandelb commented 9 years ago

Hi Melanie - something related to this came up at the HSC software meeting at Princeton today (which I called into). If we want to do star-galaxy correlations, am I right that your work on #45 has to happen? How much work is this / what is an estimated timeline for that work? Aside from #45, does anything else need to be completed in order to enable meaningful star-galaxy correlations?

msimet commented 9 years ago

45 is necessary for star-galaxy correlations involving shape, yes, and I think that's it.

If all you wanted was position, on the other hand, then we'd need to write a module to make randoms, and I think that's more suited for some of the restructuring on...hmm, I don't really have an issue for that, but the restructuring where we call the (say) CCD-level tests as we're gathering the data for the visit-level tests. But I assume you're talking about correlations involving shapes?

I can try to work on it this week at AAS but I'll also have some other demands on my time (and will spend most of Fri in transit)--I will plan on having some usable code for this early next week.

rmandelb commented 9 years ago

Yes, this is for correlations of shape, not position.

That timeline sounds good.