Closed anoronh4 closed 4 years ago
@anoronh4 You are correct, there should be fastqs returned for both PITT & JAX for this sample, I will review further and close this issue when it is fixed.
excellent! looking forward to it.
The LIMS was missing a flowcell relationship for 07951_L_1 related to the JAX run, that is now fixed.
We can see that the sample 07951_L_1 seems to have been sequenced on
PITT_0193_BHT2YMBBXX
andJAX_0150_BHT523BBXX
. however lims only returns 1 fq pair. can the source of the incongruency be clarified here? we noticed https://github.com/mskcc/LimsRest/issues/118 refers to the same IGO id, but we don't know if there's a relationship.