Closed chapmandu closed 9 years ago
No problem
It looks like the main headache with this will be fully implementing http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaSDK/latest/javadoc/com/amazonaws/services/s3/model/AccessControlList.html in a friendly way.
Does http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaSDK/latest/javadoc/com/amazonaws/services/s3/model/CannedAccessControlList.html have the sufficient granularity that you'd need?
I mean it feels like an AuthenticatedReadWrite is missing there
That's plenty. in all honesty, I would probably only use public read, and private.
No problem, I'll get that much implemented later on then :)
@chapmandu you can now specify the appropriate string as argument acl= to putObject, or alternatively do setObjectAcl( key = ' ...' , acl = = '...' )
Not a perfect solution but it adds a little bit of functionality hey :)
YES! The acl arg in putObject will be very useful.. probably more so than setObjectAcl..
It would be sexy to be able to specify an ACL on an object that may be different from the bucket's policy.