Closed benverhees closed 2 weeks ago
The cause of this issue might be the max 5 character convention that seems to be used for resource types. This character limit may have inadvertently encouraged typos or unclear abbreviations. If the 5 character limit is to be enforced, I'd suggest to use dploy
as an alternative short name. That version maintains the 5 character limit while creating a stronger resemblance to the full term, reducing the chance of it being seen as a typographical error.
Thank you for pointing out the unclear abbreviation. I went with your suggestion that uses 5 characters to keep the tool consistent.
This pull request addresses a typographical error found in the short name of the deployment resource type. Previously, it was inaccurately typed as
deloy
instead of the correct termdeploy
.